THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED IN THIS BLOG DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF ALL CONTRIBUTORS AND EACH TEAM MEMBER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FACTS AND OPINIONS CONTAINED IN HIS POST.


CLICK FLAGS FOR PAGE TRANSLATION OPTIONS

  Google  
           Search ESPRESSO ROAST Search WWW

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Should Christians Boycott The Golden Compass?


I received an email yesterday asking me to sign a petition pledging to boycott the new anti-Christian movie, The Golden Compass. This will go to distrubutors, I believe, and voice our displeasure. What a great opportunity for Christians to bind together and stand up for our rights, right?

This idea of boycotting is something that I have pretty definite feelings about and have written on before. So, I've decided to simply re-post my response to an old call for boycott.

Back in June of 2005, it was a call to boycott Ford Motor Company for their support of the homosexual agenda. Today, it's over a movie that is reported as anti-Christian. Neither of these "agendas" do I support. However, I will not openly boycott them either. I will personally boycott them by simply not giving them my money. I will not let my child be exposed to it and I hope no one else will either. I may even encourage those within my sphere of influence not to see it...probably will (just did), but that's the extent of a boycott or petition I, personally, will take part in. Why? Glad ya asked. Here is my response, originally posted here:
I am no fan of boycotts. Sure, they often have something of an effect in changing the minds of those to whom the boycott is directed (or at least gives them pause), but I am concerned that it is the kind of situation where one can win the battle but lose the war.

Rarely does the general population look at those who are calling for a boycott with favor. No, I am not advocating a "friend with the world" mentality, but please, if these well-meaning folk want to do more than simply force people to act differently through punishment, I believe a different approach might be called for. In my humble opinion, boycotts, generally speaking, serve only to isolate and marginalize the group boycotting, punish the group being boycotted, and galvanize the group the offending company is supporting. I don't know, sounds like a lose, lose, lose scenario to me.

If Christians are to stand against evil but love all individuals involved, perhaps a different strategy is called for, because with this one, the Christian is seen as someone who merely wants bad things out of society so he doesn't have to look at them. It appears self-centered. That is not the call of Christ. Should Christians stand up and be heard? Absolutely, but it must be done in such a way that fellow sinners know that they are being treated with love and compassion, just the way we all want to be treated. It must also be done in such a way that the Christian Church does not look like just another special interest group. That's a tough one to be sure.

What's an alternative? I think there is nothing wrong with an individual withholding money from any group or company that doesn't share his or her core values. People do that all the time. Further, I think there is nothing wrong with individuals communicating with the company, expressing displeasure for something that company is doing with the money that is being given it by consumers. That, too, is done for various reasons regularly.

Frankly, I see nothing wrong with a group like the AFA communicating the facts about a company with its members or subscribers in order for them to make informed decisions about their spending habits. But that's where I think it should stop. Individuals should then act on their own convictions and in such a way that the door remains open to communicate love to a world in need of a bunch of it without having to overcome the obstacles of punitive actions towards a corporation.


Is there ever a time for a boycott? Perhaps, but we should always err on the side of mercy without sacrificing the integrity of the message of Christ. There are many companies from which I have withheld financial support, but that doesn't mean that I must, in so doing, mis-communicate to the world that I hate an entire group of people. Do what your convictions tell you to do with your money, but leave the door open to demonstrate compassion and love for the world around you.

More on the subject of boycotts.

Labels: , ,

3 Comments:

Blogger Kim Reeder said...

I appreciate your fair-mindedness. On another note, I might add that it may actually be beneficial for Christians to see this movie (albeit without their children). I would have never thought this way until I heard a professor at Southern talking once about the Divinci Code. He basically said that because it had become such a phenomenon, he was going to have to read it so that he could engage people around him who actually believed in it. He felt that to be responsible, he wanted to know what it said even though he was not interested in it and didn't believe it held any truth. In the same way, it might be wise for us to see the movie if for no other reason than to be able to give a reasonable and biblical answer to those who agree with its underlying propositions.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007 4:29:00 PM  
Blogger DAVID C. PRICE said...

I totally understand your point and agree with you philosophically , but struggle with giving this guy millions from Christians who want to see his point. For him, that would still make it a huge success, fueling the coffer for the next movie in line...I'll wait until it comes out on DVD and go in with about 20 others who are interested, instead of paying the $9 or whatever apiece to get a better perspective.

Either way you look at it, it is a difficult decision on how to handle this. Though I'd love this to flop (and will pray towards that end) so that the next movie would seem fiscally irresponsible (as I understand it is the later books that really are the most troubling), I still think the best option is to simply personally abstain from going to the theatre to see the movie.

Thursday, November 29, 2007 6:57:00 AM  
Blogger DAVID C. PRICE said...

Let me throw out one more thought, Kim. It is really irrelevant as to whether the movie is blatantly "anti-Christian" or not. As a matter of fact, there is an article out today in USA today (http://www.usatoday.com/life/movies/news/2007-11-28-compass-controversy_N.htm?csp=34) where some atheists are concerned it's not anti-Christian enough(!)

Even if this particular movie is not anti-Christian, we know the other books are. Therefore, if it has the "Harry Potter Effect", millions of kids, if they enjoy the movie, will then go and buy the rest of the books. That would happen even if the movie was pro-Christian, but the books were not.

So actually seeing the movie, in this case, is less the point than knowing what the books are like. The damage will be done by the "hook" of the movie. Make sense?

Thursday, November 29, 2007 7:20:00 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Pearcey Report

My Ecosystem Details

© 2007 Espresso Roast Blog - All Rights Reserved